6/30/2023 0 Comments Halston episodes![]() ![]() There’s a scene in episode three where Halston sits down with a perfumer to develop the wildly successful Halston perfume, and she asks him to bring in scents that are meaningful to him. Sometimes his sadness is also because he’s a semi-closeted gay man, but Halston’s no more nuanced on that front, either. Every time the series needs to refer back to some pain that drives Halston’s ambition, it’s to this sketchy caricature of an unhappy childhood. And yet it is also the only real exploration of Halston’s inner life. There’s nothing particular about any of this flashback material it is as smoothly featureless as a dressmaker’s model. The first episode opens with an abrupt punch of flashback, like being socked in the stomach by knuckles tattooed with “tragic backstory”: a dreary Midwestern farmhouse, a sad child (Halston, naturally), a yelling father, the gift of a handmade feathered hat to cheer up his mom. The writing is no more impressive structurally, either. Likewise, in case you’re ever unsure about whether Halston is happy, the odds are pretty good that he’ll slam open a door and yell, I’m Halston! I’m supposed to be happy but I’m not! Someone will always arrive to say, Halston, the company is not doing well. There’s no need to wonder if the company is doing well, and there’s definitely no need to communicate that through subtle, uneasy changes in tone. That certainly seems like the case on the level of dialogue characters are perpetually issuing blunt, expositional proclamations to tell the viewer how to feel at each new stage. The less charitable reading is that the writing in Halston is simply lazy. By my count, the last two episodes average one “Halston” per minute. ![]() The word becomes empty because it is omnipresent. From that vantage point, the inescapable drumbeat of Halston, Halston, Halston in the dialogue could be read as a purposeful reenactment of the exact trap that caught Halston himself. Brand dilution is the story’s chief tragedy - which is really saying something, given that its subject dies of AIDS. Once it was on everything, the Halston name meant nothing. He wanted Halston to be a bespoke, rarefied brand, but fear and carelessness turned the name into ubiquitous department-store fodder. Portrayed by Ewan McGregor, Halston is a man so desperate to turn himself into a legend that he trades away his name too freely. As it’s told here, the Halston story is entirely about the name. There’s a generous way to read this absurd proliferation. “Good morning, Halston.” “You’re an asshole, Halston!” “Halston, you’re a genius!” “You’re out of control, Halston!” From somewhere midway through episode three until the series conclusion at the end of episode five, I counted 114 Halstons, plus three times someone called him “H” to shake things up. He was in black tie,” Jones said, as chronicled in journalist Anthony Haden-Guest’s book about the history of the club, “The Last Party.Around the middle of the third episode of Halston, thanks to a mixture of boredom and fascination, I started counting every time someone said the name “Halston.” The new Netflix limited series is about the fashion designer Roy Halston, and sometimes characters say the name to point at the brand: “This bottle says ‘Halston!’” or “Now that’s a Halston.” Often it’s just part of the dialogue, an unrelenting verbal tic. “This guy got stuck in a vent trying to get in. This bit of Studio 54 lore comes from a man named Baird Jones, who was a promoter for parties at Studio 54 and other New York nightclubs in the ’70s. In reality, yes, somebody did seemingly try to sneak into Studio 54 through the vents, but it was actually a man, and we don’t actually know the particulars of when it happened or how they found him. The woman in the vents is, I suppose, a similar stretching of history. And then, I guess, three more years pass before the next scene. In the scene immediately before Liza leaves for rehab in this same episode, we see Halston reading an article in The New York Times with the headline “Rare Cancer Seen in 41 Homosexuals.” That article was published on July 3, 1981, a couple years after the Studio 54 shutdown above. “Halston” does, by the way, imply that some time had passed - but not that much time. ![]() As Netflix, Amazon Boycott HFPA Over Reforms, Could the Golden Globes Get Canceled? ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |